Looking ahead with data
Historical patterns are used to make an evidence-based estimate of what may happen next.
Use asset data to plan maintenance earlier and more precisely.
Scheduled maintenance can come too early or too late, while unexpected failures disrupt operations. Organisations do not always use the available asset data in their planning. Predictive maintenance uses data to forecast maintenance needs or identify potential anomalies.
An application only becomes meaningful when it fits a specific task and the information available for that task.
Feasibility depends on the available data and demonstrable predictability. That is why we define in advance what the solution should and should not do, how its results will be checked and who remains responsible.
Historical patterns are used to make an evidence-based estimate of what may happen next.
The results help staff weigh up future capacity, stock or maintenance needs.
Predictions are tested and remain a tool to support decision-making.
We define what to predict and how far ahead.
We assess historical data for quality and predictability.
We start with a simple method and compare performance.
We test predictions against historical periods and review them with experts.
We integrate the results into the process and monitor model performance.
This service is relevant to asset-intensive organisations. The specific setup depends on the process, the available data and the risks involved in its use.
That’s why we start with a clearly defined application and only expand it once the initial setup works in practice.
This service addresses the following challenge: predictive maintenance uses data to predict maintenance needs or potential anomalies. How it works in practice depends on the process and the data available.
The service can be relevant to asset-intensive organisations. A clear need and usable information matter more than the size of the organisation.
That depends on the application. We start with the question you need to address, then determine which data or sources are necessary and suitable.
No. For fixed, predictable tasks, conventional automation may be enough. We choose the simplest approach that addresses the challenge effectively and add complexity only when needed.
We define the scope of the application, check the results with users and put appropriate controls in place. After deployment, we monitor how it works and adjust the solution when the data, its use or the context changes.
Want to explore where it makes sense to start with predictive maintenance? Together, we’ll assess the challenge, the available information and the prerequisites.